Year : 2006 | Volume
: 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : 74--7
Clinical evaluation of an ionic tooth brush on oral hygiene status, gingival status, and microbial parameter
J Deshmukh, KL Vandana, KT Chandrashekar, B Savitha
Department of Periodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere 577004, Karnataka, India
K L Vandana
Department of Periodontics, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere 577004, Karnataka
It has long been recognised that the presence of dental plaque leads to gingivitis and periodontal disease, as well as dental caries. Today tooth brushing is the most widely accepted method of removing plaque. Hence this present clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of an ionic toothbrush on oral hygiene status. For this study, 20 dental students in the age group of 18-20 years were included. All the subjects after undergoing dental prophylaxis were then provided with ionic toothbrushes, either active (equipped with lithium battery) or inactive (without lithium battery). Plaque index and gingival bleeding index were examined at 7th, 14th, and 21st day. Microbial assessment was done for detection of colony forming units (CFU) from the plaque samples which were collected on 0 day and 21st day, both before brushing and after brushing. Results shown a significant reduction in all the parameters and the reduction was more significant in active and inactive ionic toothbrush users. It was concluded that both active and inactive ionic toothbrushes reduced the plaque index and gingival bleeding index scores significantly and active ionic tooth brushes were more effective as compared to inactive ionic toothbrushes. There was no soft tissue trauma following the use of both type of toothbrushes, which showed that ionic toothbrushes were equally safe for regular long-term use.
|How to cite this article:|
Deshmukh J, Vandana K L, Chandrashekar K T, Savitha B. Clinical evaluation of an ionic tooth brush on oral hygiene status, gingival status, and microbial parameter.Indian J Dent Res 2006;17:74-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Deshmukh J, Vandana K L, Chandrashekar K T, Savitha B. Clinical evaluation of an ionic tooth brush on oral hygiene status, gingival status, and microbial parameter. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2006 [cited 2022 May 21 ];17:74-7
Available from: https://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2006/17/2/74/29887
Periodontal disease and dental caries, both plaque related diseases are recognized as two of the most common diseases world wide and it has long been recognized that the presence of dental plaque leads to gingivitis and periodontal disease, as well as caries . Today tooth brushing is the most widely accepted method of removing plaque and has a very high degree of social acceptability . Tooth brushes now come in bewildering range of styles and varieties accomplished by complex product descriptions and scientific design theories, but no research team has yet come up with conclusive proof that one brand performs better than other.
Ionic toothbrush works on the principle of polarity that every element in nature has a positive or negative charge. So far only few studies have been undertaken to assess efficiency of ionic toothbrush and have revealed inconsistent results. Hence this present clinical study is undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of ionic toothbrush on oral hygiene status including clinical parameters such as plaque index and bleeding index. Additionally, microbial colony count was assessed from plaque taken before brushing and after brushing for groups using active tonic tooth brush.
PRINCIPLES OF THE IONIC ACTION MECHANISM
The bonding between the pellicles and bacteria is mediated by Ca2+ bridge formation. The anions, supplied by the lithium battery inhibits the bonding between the bacteria and Ca2+ and prevents the bacteria from adsorbing to the pellicles. Hence the plaque accumulation is reduced because the above mentioned anions continuously supplied from the tips of the bristles of the ionic toothbrushes prevent the mild electrostatic bonding between the bacteria perse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this study, 20 dental students from College of Dental Sciences, Davangere were selected.' The students fell into the age group of 18-20 years among which 15 males and 5 females were enrolled for this double blind study which was divided into two study trials i.e. study trial land study trial It.
Volunteers were screened at the out patient department of Periodontics and those who m et al l the criteria were selected accordingly. The inclusion criteria included a plaque score ranging from 2-3 of Tureskey-Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quigley Hein plaque index, healthy subjects who had the presence of more than 20 natural teeth excluding plaque retentive areas such as grossly carious teeth or orthodontically bonded abutments, absence of major hard and soft tissue oral lesions and maintenance of oral hygiene by brushing the teeth once daily.
The exclusion criteria were if patient had taken antibiotic or underwent dental prophylaxis one month prior to the inclusion in the study, pregnant and lactating females, those with grossly neglected oral hygiene and with any physical limiting manual dexterity.
The following clinical parameters were recorded.
Plaque index [Turesky Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index 1970]Gingival bleeding index (Ainamo and Bay 1975)
Microbial assessment was done for detection of colony forming units [CFU] from the plaque samples which were collected on 0 day and 21 st day both before brushing and after brushing. The samples were suspended in 0.3 ml of 0.9 % sterile sodium chloride solution and in order to minimize dumping of samples they were processed within one hour of collection. Plaque samples were transferred to culture media [blood agar] with the help of sterile platinum loop in a streaky manner and incubated at 37°C temperature maintained fm48 to 72 Ins.
Study Trial I [0-21 days]
Following a review of the subjects' dental and medical history by the principal investigator at baseline (0 day), the subjects were examined at the end of the week i.e. 7th, 14th and 21 st day. The principal investigator assessed the plaque index [Turesky Gilmore Glickman modification of Quingley Hein plaque index 1970] and gingival bleeding index [Ainamo and Bay 1975]. The coinvestigator allotted the ionic tooth brushes either in active or inactive state at the beginning of both the experimental periods. Additionally an evaluation of bleeding was performed according to gingival bleeding index (Ainamo and Bay 1975). All the subjects then underwent a dental prophylaxis consisting of supragingival scaling and rubber cup polishing. Each of the subjects were then provided with an ionic toothbrushes, (hyG ionic tooth brush, Hukuba Dental Corporation, Japan) either active [equipped with lithium battery] or inactive [without lithium battery] according to double blind method. The inactive ionic toothbrush served as the control. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth twice daily using only the assigned ionic toothbrushes and dentifrice (colgate dental cream) provided to them, using roll method for atleast 3 rain. Verbal and written instructions were given regarding manipulation of ionic tooth brush so that their moist fingers touched the metal band during tooth brushing. On 7th, 14th and 21 st day, the subjects were asked to refrain from brushing 12 to 14 Ins prior to their evaluation time, so as to allow overnight plaque formation and the assessment of plaque scores was made before and after using the ionic toothbrushes in the outpatient department. The intraoral tissues were examined at each visit of the subject and any changes in oral soft tissues including lacerations or any other pathology was noted. Study trial-I was completed on 21 st day.
Washout period (21st 28thday)
All the subjects were requested to resume their normal oral hygiene measures for following one week according to their own way using regular or conventional type of manual tooth brushes to counteract any carry over effects, until the start of the study trial-II.
Study trial-II (28th to 49th day)
Study trial-II was started on 28th day. The subjects were provided with ionic toothbrushes contrary to the study trail-I period according to double blind method. All the steps of study trail-I were repeated on 28th, 35th, 42nd and 49th day. After 49th day clinical examination, study trialII was concluded.
Out of 20 volunteers, 19 completed the study. One volunteer was excluded from the study because he took antibiotics. The results of various clinical parameters are presented (Table 1][Table 2][Table 3][Table 4][Table 5).
Mean plaque index for active ionic tooth brush group at baseline was 2.09±0.07 and on 21st day the mean value was 0.36±0.14 showing a reduction of 1.72 ± 0.15 i.e. 82% from baseline which was highly significant (P et al  weighed the amount of plaque left on teeth surfaces after brushing. By weighing quantitatively the plaque, he found that the active ionic tooth brush removed significantly higher amount of plaque when compared to inactive ionic toothbrush. They also compared the dried weight of plaque collected after brushing which was correlated with the plaque index. Yoshinobu Maki et al  also observed that active ionic toothbrush removes plaque efficiently. They attributed it to ionic action mechanism, wherein they proposed that plaque accumulation is reduced because the anions (-ve charge) continuously supplied from the tips of bristles of ionic toothbrushes prevent the mild electrostatic bonding between the bacteria and tooth surfaces or between bacteria itself.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
From the observations of this study the following conclusions were drawn from this study:
There was statistically significant difference in plaque index and bleeding index scores for both the groups i.e. active ionic toothbrush group and inactive ionic toothbrush group during the study trials.Both active and inactive ionic toothbrushes reduced the plaque index and bleeding index scores significantly.On comparison between the active ionic toothbrush and inactive ionic toothbrush over both the study trials, there was significant difference noted in plaque removal efficiency of active ionic toothbrush.There was no soft tissue trauma following the use of both type of toothbrushes, which shows that ionic toothbrushes are equally safe for regular long term use.
As evident from the present study, it can be concluded that active ionic toothbrush is both safe and effective in the removal of plaque and reduction of gingival bleeding. Further long-term clinical and microbiological studies are recommended to evaluate the efficacy of ionic tooth brushes and to support the principles of ionic action mechanism.
We profusely express our sense of gratitude to Mr. Toshio Tobe, Director, Hukuba Dental Corporation, Japan, for sponsoring this study, without whose support this study would have not been possible. We are greatful for his timely help and cooperation extended till the completion of this study.
|1||Waerhaug J: Prevalence of periodontal disease in Ceylon. ActaOdontol Scand, 22:121-135,1997. |
|2||Frendsenh A: Mechanical oral hygiene practices. In Loe H, Kleinnan D.V. (eds) Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. WashingtonDC, IRLPress,1986-93.|
|3||Vanswol RL et al : Clinical evaluation of an ionic tooth brush in the removal of established plaque and reduction of gingivitis. 27: 389-394,1996. |
|4||Pucherffetal: The effectiveness of anionic tooth brush in the removal of dental plaque and reduction of gingivitis in orthodontic patients. Periodontal Abstracts, 47:101-107, 1999. |
|5||MakiYetal:Plaque removal effectiveness oftooth brush employing lithium battery. Shikwa Gakuho, 93:561-574,1993.|
|6||Otani H et al : Effectiveness of an iontophoretic tooth brush on plaque removal. The N ippon Dental Review, 530:251-257,1986.|