ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015 | Volume
: 26 | Issue : 6 | Page : 609--612
Comparison of semilunar coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with button technique in the treatment of Miller�SQ�s Class I and II gingival recessions: A pilot study
Rajat Bhandari1, Ranjit Singh Uppal2, Karanprakash Singh Kahlon3
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
2 Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
3 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ranjit Singh Uppal
Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Genesis Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Ferozepur, Punjab
India
Background: Gingival recession (GR) is one of the most common esthetic and functional concerns associated with periodontal disease. A variety of surgical procedures has been introduced to the field of cosmetic periodontology for the treatment of GR.
Aim: To evaluate and compare the clinical outcome of semilunar coronally advanced flap (SCAF) with and without button technique in the treatment of Miller�SQ�s Class I and II GRs.
Study Design: A total of 12 subjects with bilateral single Miller�SQ�s Class I and II recession were selected for the study. Split mouth design was used.
Materials and Methods: Surgical sites were randomly divided into test and control groups. In control sites, SCAF alone was done whereas in test site, a combination of SCAF and button technique was performed. The clinical parameters including GR, periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment level (CAL), and width of keratinized gingiva were recorded at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. Data so collected were put to statistical analysis.
Statistical Analysis: Student�SQ�s t-test was used to find significance of parameters between baseline and 6 months. For inter-group comparisons paired t-test was performed.
Results: Statistically significant improvements were recorded in both groups from baseline to 6 months. Inter-group comparison yielded statistically significant differences in GR and CAL in favor of test group.
Conclusion: Combination of SCAF and button technique resulted in statistically significant improvements in clinical parameters as compared to SCAF alone. Future clinical studies with much larger sample size and longer follow-up periods are warranted.
How to cite this article:
Bhandari R, Uppal RS, Kahlon KS. Comparison of semilunar coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with button technique in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recessions: A pilot study.Indian J Dent Res 2015;26:609-612
|
How to cite this URL:
Bhandari R, Uppal RS, Kahlon KS. Comparison of semilunar coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with button technique in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recessions: A pilot study. Indian J Dent Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 May 31 ];26:609-612
Available from: https://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2015;volume=26;issue=6;spage=609;epage=612;aulast=Bhandari;type=0 |
|
|
|
